Skip to content

Causina Team

Understanding the Automatism Defense in Criminal Law

The automatism defense addresses a fundamental principle of criminal law: a person is generally liable only for voluntary conduct. When an accused acted without conscious control, criminal responsibility may be contested. Claims of automatism can… 

Impossibility Defense: Legal Principles and Applications

Inchoate offenses punish conduct directed toward crime before the intended harm is completed. The impossibility defense addresses a difficult question: should liability arise when completion was impossible from the outset? Distinctions between legal impossibility, factual… 

Understanding Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in Law

The reasonable expectation of privacy is a central principle in search and seizure law, defining when government conduct becomes a Fourth Amendment search. It balances individual privacy interests against legitimate law-enforcement objectives. From homes and… 

Voluntary Intoxication Defense: Legal Scope and Limits

Alcohol or drug use may impair judgment, memory, and self-control, but impairment does not automatically eliminate criminal responsibility. The voluntary intoxication defense addresses a narrower legal question: whether intoxication prevented the prosecution from proving the… 

Understanding Attempted Felony Murder Charges and Law

Attempted felony murder presents a difficult intersection of two criminal-law concepts: attempt, which ordinarily requires intent, and felony murder, which may impose liability for an unintended death during a felony. This tension has led many… 

Understanding the Involuntary Intoxication Defense

The involuntary intoxication defense may arise when a person commits an alleged offense while impaired by alcohol, drugs, or medication taken without meaningful knowledge or consent. Unlike voluntary intoxication, it can challenge whether the accused…